Listen below or click here for full show notes
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe:
SUBSPACE CHATTER
MAIN MISSION
Joe provided today’s topic, which looks at how some people define what “Star Trek” is:
Is it right to criticize a new iteration of “Star Trek,” the Kelvin timeline movies, for instance, simply because it may not take modern problems and discussing them wrapped in sci-fi metaphors?
After all, while it’s true that Star Trek has done things like that fairly often, it’s not as if that is all the show did. For years the most popular episode of TOS was “The Trouble with Tribbles,” which is just an out-and-out comedy. Or take “The Wrath of Khan,” which is basically a revenge thriller without some deeper metaphorical meaning.
Is it right that some people look at Trek and pigeonhole it in this way? Saying “This is what Star Trek is”?
Warp Speed Roundtable
Which one of these three “Star Trek: The Animated Series” characters would you most like to see brought to life? And why?
- Lt. Arex, the Edosian navigator
- Lt. M’Ress, the Caitian communications officer
- The Glommer, the genetically-engineered Tribble eater
End of Show
If you liked the show, please be sure to tell a friend about it. And subscribe, so you’ll never miss an episode.
We’d love to hear from you. Follow us on Twitter (@thetopicistrek), visit our Facebook page or visit thetopicistrek.com
Until next time, on behalf of Chuck, Kreg, Joe and myself, I’m Clinton, thanking you for listening. And, as we always say here on “The Topic Is Trek”
Don’t put on the red shirt!